Crisis modifiers: a solution for a more flexible development-humanitarian system?

  • By Katie Peters and Florence Pichon
  • 09/11/2017

Credit: Pablo Tosco / Oxfam

Share

By design, the humanitarian–development aid architecture is divided by mandates and rules that were originally designed to meet different kinds of needs.  Today, this rigidity is hampering the aid system’s ability to manage risks and rapidly respond to crises.  Pre-planned development programmes do not have the flexibility to quickly reallocate funding to address spikes in need, and humanitarian organisations are largely confined to funding instruments that prevent longer-term engagement in vulnerability reduction. 

To address these issues, donors and NGOs are trialling a new set of innovative risk financing options to help deal with small-scale crises that impede development progress, and a humanitarian fund Providing Humanitarian Assistance for Sahel Emergencies (PHASE) has been embedded into to the multi-year Building Resilience to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) programme.  This ‘crisis modifier’ is designed to enable early action and rapid response to new humanitarian needs that manifested in the project areas, and in doing so, protect development gains BRACED projects had made.

This paper showcases evidence from the use of the PHASE crisis modifier and situates crisis modifiers as a potential ‘solution’ for a more flexible aid system – if they are accompanied by a fundamental shift in the way development actors design their programmes and respond to predictable risks.

Video

In warming Mali, weather forecasts help cool flaring tempers

A text messaging service in Mali helps farmers cope with unpredictable weather patterns linked to climate change

Blogs

NGOs are shaking up climate services in Africa. Should we be worried?

A concern is around the long-term viability of hard-fought development gains


The paradox of water development in Kenya's drylands

In Kenya's Wajir county, the emphasis on water development is happening at the expense of good water governance


Local funding fears as Britain sunsets climate resilience programme

Aid workers worry development projects will run short of money, putting hard-won gains at risk


Should aid work stop when militants move in?

Development groups grapple with the insecurity that limits help for those who most need it in fragile states


Latest Photos

Tweets