Evaluating complex programmes: Reflections on realism and resilience

  • By Jennifer Leavy, Stephen McDowell, Edward Boydell, Gretta Fitzgerald and Nicola Giordano
  • 30/08/2017

Image: Albert Gonzalez Farran / UNAMID

Share

What works and why in implementing and achieving outcomes in adaptation and resilience-building projects? This paper considers the challenges faced and lessons learned in the mid-term review of BRACED projects to provide insights into using realist principles to evaluate complex, resilience-building programmes in an international development context.

Video

From camel to cup

'From Camel to Cup' explores the importance of camels and camel milk in drought ridden regions, and the under-reported medicinal and vital health benefits of camel milk

Blogs

NGOs are shaking up climate services in Africa. Should we be worried?

A concern is around the long-term viability of hard-fought development gains


The paradox of water development in Kenya's drylands

In Kenya's Wajir county, the emphasis on water development is happening at the expense of good water governance


Local funding fears as Britain sunsets climate resilience programme

Aid workers worry development projects will run short of money, putting hard-won gains at risk


Should aid work stop when militants move in?

Development groups grapple with the insecurity that limits help for those who most need it in fragile states


Latest Photos

Tweets