What do people really think about climate change?

  • By Zoe Tabary
  • 02/02/2018

In this 2014 file photo, a man walks on the street during heavy smog in the central Bosnian town of Zenica. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

Share

A 2017 survey on global threats found that nearly nine in 10 people would be ready to make changes to their standard of living if it would prevent future climate catastrophes – indicating that many people now see climate change as a bigger threat than other traditional or rising concerns such as epidemics. 

Yet in the world’s largest economy, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed to limit federal funding for science research and voiced scepticism over climate change. 

Nowhere is the polarisation of public opinion on climate change more apparent than in the United States, according to Cass Sunstein, a Harvard University professor and adviser to former President Barack Obama. 

Much of that polarisation has to do with the “good news, bad news” effect, whereby “people update beliefs asymmetrically”, he told an audience at the London School of Economics (LSE) on Thursday. 

“Weak believers in climate change update their beliefs only when they get good news – like smaller temperature increases than anticipated – while strong believers are more likely to credit bad news,” he said. 

“That creates polarisation in their beliefs.”

Sunstein also attributed the divide on climate change to a “solution aversion” effect, where people’s perception of a solution to a problem is likely to affect their judgement on the existence and magnitude of that problem.

“So if someone is strongly opposed to high electricity tariffs, they’re less likely to think that climate change exists or is important,” he said.

That makes it crucial to think about how climate changes issues are communicated to the public, if they are to have a desired effect on behaviours, he added. 

LSE professor Nicholas Stern agreed, saying “we don’t seem to be terribly good at getting climate change arguments across”.

Using a “trusted messenger” like revered British naturalist David Attenborough to raise awareness of climate change could help reach sceptical audiences, he suggested. 

“He looks like someone who has seen the evidence on climate change and gradually come out in favour of the issue – which I think can convince people to take action,” said Stern. 

Efforts to tackle climate change will also fall on deaf ears if they don’t use terms that people can understand, say experts.

In northern Burkina Faso, for example, a new guide translates over 500 French and English meteorological terms into the more colourful phrases that local farmers use – a solar eclipse, for example, is when “the cat catches the sun”.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Braced or its partners.

Video

From camel to cup

From Camel to Cup' explores the importance of camels and camel milk in drought ridden regions, and the under-reported medicinal and vital health benefits of camel milk

Blogs

As climate risks rise, insurance needed to protect development

Less than 5 percent of disaster losses are covered by insurance in poorer countries, versus 50 percent in rich nations


Disasters happen to real people – and it's complicated

Age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and many more factors must be considered if people are to become resilient to climate extremes


NGOs are shaking up climate services in Africa. Should we be worried?

A concern is around the long-term viability of hard-fought development gains


The paradox of water development in Kenya's drylands

In Kenya's Wajir county, the emphasis on water development is happening at the expense of good water governance


Latest Photos

Tweets

Update cookies preferences